TOP

Realtor struggles with squatters

RIO RANCHO, N.M. (KRQE) – A Rio Rancho relator says she’s dealing with a family of squatters.

It’s a problem that first came to surface Wednesday, by Sunday the realtor was forced to take things into her own hands going to the home herself and telling the family to “get out.”

Realtor Jenny Klingler, NM Land Realty, LLC said she just wants to put her client’s home on the market, and will do anything to make that possible.  But that simple task is proving to be much harder than she thought.

Sunday was her second attempt to clear the family out of her client’s home.

“You guys aren’t supposed to be here,” she told them as Rio Rancho Police escorted her to the door and News 13 cameras rolled. “There wasn’t any authorization for someone to move in.”

Klingler explained the homeowner moved to Las Vegas, NV, and hired an attorney to take care of the house, and then called her to list it, but when she tried to do that she got quite the surprise.

“They’re just squatting there,” Klingler exclaimed. “A whole family. I feel really bad for them, but they’re not allowed.”

She also said the house is a mess. “There was a couch, a chair and the beds were just laying on the floor with a box springs and mattress. There was a whole bunch of boxes with kitchen utensils on the kitchen counters. You’re trying to do your job. You’re trying to take pictures of a house that looks like that, and it’s very hard to show and sell if there’s people squatting in your home.”

Fed up and acting on her client’s behalf Klingler had called police Saturday. A man living inside the home was arrested on an outstanding warrant and the family was told they needed to leave.

Klinger said they are doing anything but that and says neighbors saw the family moving more items into the home Sunday morning.

Klingler insisted the family knows what they’re doing is wrong and said it is the son of the homeowner’s attorneys who’s staying in the house.

The attorney didn’t want to go on camera, but he showed News 13 a letter he said proves he has the authority to monitor the house. Klingler explained monitoring is much different than moving in.

Sunday with police once again on site and News 13 cameras rolling she got the family to agree they would move out by Monday evening.

If they are not out by then, the homeowner might have to file a civil complaint with the county and move to get them evicted.

The homeowner has since fired his attorney.

The attorney and his son say the whole situation is a big misunderstanding. While they did not agree to be interviewed, they say they were never squatting in the home and were only occupying the property to keep it safe.

Article source: http://www.krqe.com/dpp/news/central/realtor-struggles-with-squatters

Read More
TOP

SEB ImmoInvest real estate fund to be dissolved

Mon May 7, 2012 10:14am EDT

Article source: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/07/idUS133914+07-May-2012+HUG20120507

Read More
TOP

Sacramento to consider $4.8M loan for Township 9 affordable housing project








Kelly Johnson
Staff Writer and Social-Media Strategist – Sacramento Business Journal

Email
 | Twitter
 | Facebook
 | Google

A proposal to loan up to $4.8 million to the Township 9 affordable housing project is scheduled to go before the Sacramento City Council on Tuesday.

The Township 9 development is a 2,350-unit, mixed-use development in the former River District redevelopment area north of Richards Boulevard on North 7th Street.

The 1.83-acre project would contain a five-story residential mixed-use building with ground-floor retail, according to a city staff report. Also, 179 affordable homes would surround three sides of a four-story parking garage that the city would pay for separately with state funding.

The $4.8 million loan would be made up of $1.8 million from the city’s Home Investment Partnership Program within the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency 


and from $3 million of tax increment funding that the redevelopment previously allocated to the project, the staff report said.

By loaning funds to the project, the city of Sacramento helps satisfy its affordable housing obligations required by a 2006 state proposition and boosts efforts to eliminate blight in the area, the report said.

Kelly Johnson covers retail, sports, insurance, education, nonprofits, manufacturing, social media, international trade, distributors/wholesalers and disability access for the Sacramento Business Journal.

bizWatch

See all your followed company news on your personalized dashboard.

To access the full benefits of bizWatch and receive a weekly email with aggregated news on all the companies you are following, please provide your email address below.

You must have a bizjournals account to follow a company.
Please Log In or Register.


Article source: http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2012/05/07/sacramento-loan-township-9-housing-proje.html

Read More
TOP

Business Journal takes three firsts at California Newspaper Publishers …







The Sacramento Business Journal 


won four prizes at the California Newspaper Publishers Association’s annual meeting in San Jose on Saturday.

The newspaper also won recognition in the association’s 2011 Better Newspapers Contest as a finalist in five other categories. The Sacramento Business Journal competed against newspapers statewide with weekly circulation of 11,000 to 25,000.

The winners:

  • “Just like brothers,” by staff writer Michael Shaw, won first place for Best Feature Story. The June 24 story profiled Sacramento developers Buzz Oates and Joe Benvenuti, who have been friends for six decades, and their influence on commercial real estate in the region.
  • “Structures 2011,” an annual publication overseen by managing editor Gary Chazen, won first place for Best Special Section. Published Sept. 23, the section looked at major building projects in the region, focusing on the new Terminal B at Sacramento International Airport.
  • “Think Big, California,” by editor Jack Robinson, won first place for Best Editorial. Published July 29, the editorial argued that the California High Speed Rail project, despite its failures and challenges, is a worthy investment in the state’s future.
  • Plan to reinvigorate Delta puts landowners on hold,” by staff writer Melanie Turner, won second place for coverage of the environment. The story in the paper’s weekly “Focus” section on June 17 looked at consequences of a massive restoration effort for growers and other property owners in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.

The finalists, which scored in the top 10 percent of entries in their categories:

  • “Who gets hurt if the Kings leave town,” a March 4 story led by staff writer Kelly Johnson
  • A package of stories Sept. 9 about the business of medical marijuana, led by staff writer Kathy Robertson
  • An Oct. 21 graphic illustrating international trade by production manager Heather Witzens
  • Two photographs by photo editor Dennis McCoy: the cover of a July 15 “Best real estate projects” special section and an Oct. 7 feature photo accompanying a story about hospice care.

bizWatch

See all your followed company news on your personalized dashboard.

To access the full benefits of bizWatch and receive a weekly email with aggregated news on all the companies you are following, please provide your email address below.

You must have a bizjournals account to follow a company.
Please Log In or Register.


Article source: http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/news/2012/05/07/business-journal-awards-cnpa-winners.html

Read More
TOP

Clayton Holdings Names Jenine Fitter Senior Managing Director, Business …


SHELTON, Conn., May 7, 2012 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ –
Clayton Holdings LLC, a leading provider of due diligence, underwriting, surveillance and default servicing to the residential and commercial mortgage and fixed-income industries, announced today that Jenine Fitter has joined the company as senior managing director of business development.

In this role, Fitter will be responsible for sales and business development initiatives across all of Clayton’s offerings, including credit risk management, due diligence, consulting and special servicing through its Quantum Servicing unit. She will report to Tom Donatacci, executive vice president of business development, and will play a key role in identifying the needs of existing clients and expanding Clayton’s reach to new customers and markets.

Fitter joins Clayton with more than 20 years of experience in the mortgage and asset-backed securities arena. Most recently, she was senior vice president of mortgage solution sales at Digital Risk. She has also held senior sales roles at CoreLogic’s BasePoint Analytics, a fraud company, and at Standard Poor’s. Fitter began her career with Fitch, where over a 10-year-period, she was promoted to senior roles in its residential mortgage group, ultimately becoming manager and senior director.

“Mortgage risk is very much a concern for investors, issuers and lenders,” said Donatacci. “Jenine’s broad experience–beginning at the ratings agencies, and moving into fraud detection, diligence and credit risk management–provides valuable insights to our clients and our team.”

About Clayton Holdings LLC

Clayton Holdings LLC, headquartered in Shelton, Connecticut, provides information and services that financial institutions, investors and government entities use to evaluate, acquire, securitize, service and monitor loans and asset-backed securities. Clayton offerings include risk-based analytics, residential and commercial loan due diligence, consulting, surveillance, independent pricing, and staffing solutions. The company provides customized residential and commercial special servicing solutions through its Quantum Servicing subsidiary and REO management, BPOs and a short sale program through its Green River Capital subsidiary. A global reach in the financial services industry is provided by the company’s European subsidiary, Clayton EuroRisk. Additional information is available at
www.clayton.com .

SOURCE Clayton Holdings LLC

Copyright (C) 2012 PR Newswire. All rights reserved

Article source: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/clayton-holdings-names-jenine-fitter-senior-managing-director-business-development-2012-05-07

Read More
TOP

Mortgage-Relief Programs Continue to Confuse, Frustrate Some Oklahomans


(Source: Cary Aspinwall Tulsa World, Okla. (MCT) — Mike Wise has accepted that soon he will be forced to pack up his Sand Springs home of eight years and find somewhere else to live.

“The reality right now is I’m going to lose my house,” Wise said.

 

The Tulsa World featured Wise in an early February story about homeowners facing foreclosure after hitting hard financial times, as the state announced an $18.6 million settlement for Oklahoma homeowners who were victims of “unfair and deceptive practices” by Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo and GMAC during the mortgage and foreclosure crisis.

 

Chase filed paperwork on April 27 in Tulsa County Court to begin the foreclosure process on Wise’s home.

 

He hasn’t applied for the Oklahoma program or any federal relief, and attempts to modify his mortgage through Chase have only ended in frustration and confusion.

 

“Honestly, the government doesn’t seem to care,” he said. “You don’t know who to ask or where to turn to.”

 

Wise lost his job in April 2009 and sought mortgage relief as he looked for work. He worked as many as three jobs at one point just to make ends meet.

 

Wise said he contacted Chase as soon as he lost his job and told them he wanted to pay as much as he could scrape together toward his monthly payment. He sent in $900 toward the $1,300 payment for three months. But Chase customer service agents told him he couldn’t qualify for mortgage modification unless he stopped making payments altogether, he said.

 

He applied for modification, and it took several months to get an answer. When he did, Chase offered him a forbearance plan that was $13 a month more than his old monthly payment.

 

After about a year, he found a new job he loves, as a residential youth worker for a nonprofit – but it pays less than his previous career. He still can’t afford a mortgage payment of more than $1,300, he said.

 

Greg Hassell, a spokesman for Chase bank, said each case is different, but in some cases where homeowners haven’t made payments for several months or years, the unpaid principal can result in a higher payment after mortgage modification.

 

“It helps the customer because the customer was able to not pay their monthly payment for several years while going through the tough time – but yet they’re still able to keep their home,” Hassell said. “And when the situation improves, you pick up your mortgage payment again.”

 

In many cases, Chase is simply the mortgage servicing company or has to abide by federal rules that govern HAMP funding, he said.

 

Most recently, Wise said he was told his income of $11.50 per hour prevents him from qualifying for additional assistance.

 

“I make too much money to qualify for help, but I can’t afford my mortgage,” he said.

 

And he’s too far behind on the payments to catch up.

 

“I begged them: Can I just pay something?” he said. “They told me to hold off on payments, every month. I was told that making any payments would kick me out of the mortgage modification program.”

 

His home is not scheduled for the sheriff’s auction yet, but Wise is not optimistic about getting help.

 

“The irritating thing is that I’ve paid my taxes and had a job since I was 16 years old,” he said. “Now I’m in a hard spot and can’t get any help.”

 

 

Apply early for Oklahoma’s restitution fund Oklahomans applying for the state’s mortgage foreclosure restitution fund should start the process as early as possible, the Attorney General’s Office said.

 

The deadline to apply is Sept. 13

 

“This is not a thing where you can probably start on Sept. 12 and get your application completed in time,” spokeswoman Diane Clay said. “You don’t want to wait until the last minute and miss the deadline just because you don’t have the documents you need.”

 

After opting Oklahoma out of a national settlement, state Attorney General Scott Pruitt helped negotiate an $18.6 million agreement in February for compensatory damages for Oklahoma homeowners who were victims of “unfair and deceptive practices” by Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, Wells Fargo and GMAC during the mortgage and foreclosure crisis.



 

Oklahomans who think they were subjected to unfair and unlawful practices during the foreclosure process can apply for compensation at or by calling 405-521-2029.

 

The state is developing an index to determine how much Oklahoma residents can be compensated for damages through the program if they’ve been harmed by unfair lending practices. As of last week, the AG’s Office had received 135 applications.

 

Homeowners who aren’t sure if they qualify for the program are encouraged to call the office and answer some basic questions to see if they may benefit from the relief. Only Oklahoma residents are eligible, and the home in question must be the primary residence.

 

“At this point, we’re waiting until we have all the applications to start handing out compensation checks,” Clay said. “But we do know it will be more than the $2,000 that other states are offering.”

 

Pruitt’s office wanted to offer homeowners “compensation that was meaningful,” she said.

 

“You’re talking about people who may have lost their homes already,” Clay said. “Two thousand dollars just didn’t seem adequate for that.”

 

Applying for Oklahoma’s relief program does not prevent homeowners from applying for federal programs designed to help homeowners who are underwater or behind on their payments, Clay said.

 

For information on the refinancing and mortgage reduction options provided by the federal settlement, Oklahomans whose mortgages are with the banks involved in the settlement should call the following toll-free numbers:

 

Bank of America: 877-488-7814

 

Citigroup: 866-272-4749

 

GMAC: 800-766-4622

 

JPMorgan Chase: 866-372-6901

 

Wells Fargo: 800-288-3212

 

 

Couple bake their way out of home foreclosure There’s a happy ending to the story of a Broken Arrow family who fought foreclosure in Feburary by baking hundreds of carrot cakes.

 

Mike Douthitt and his wife, Kim, faced financial hardship after taking in their three grandchildren and racking up legal bills in the ensuing custody battle. They fell about seven months behind on mortgage payments while waiting to see if they qualified for a modification program.

 

They decided to bake their way out of financial trouble, selling Kim’s homemade carrot cakes to more than 500 neighbors, church friends and readers who learned about their story in the Tulsa World. They saved their home and have continued baking cakes to help with the added expense of raising three grandchildren.

 

“We worked our tails off,” Mike Douthitt said. “We were just completely and totally awestruck by the response.”

 

The Douthitts are grateful so many people were willing to buy cakes to help them avoid foreclosure. Now they take orders through a Facebook page ( tulsaworld.com/24karatkakes) and bake about 20 cakes a month to help keep their finances in shape, he said.

 

 

 

Cary Aspinwall 918-581-8477

cary.aspinwall@tulsaworld.com

___

©2012 Tulsa World (Tulsa, Okla.)

Visit Tulsa World (Tulsa, Okla.) at www.tulsaworld.com

Distributed by MCT Information Services

Source: Cary Aspinwall Tulsa World, Okla. (MCT)


Article source: http://www.loansafe.org/mortgage-relief-programs-continue-to-confuse-frustrate-some-oklahomans

Read More
TOP

‘HOMEOWNER BILL OF RIGHTS’ MOVING ALONG IN SACRAMENTO – U


The idea behind the bills package is to stem unnecessary foreclosures, which have hit certain parts of California especially hard. Since 2007, more than 63,000 trustee deeds, which signal a foreclosure, have been filed in San Diego County. U-T file photo

A set of proposed laws that aim to protect California homeowners from foreclosure abuses is working its way through the Legislature.

Two key pieces of legislation in that package, widely called the “Homeowner Bill of Rights,” are expected to face sharp criticism from the real estate and financial sectors as the proposals head to a special hearing Thursday, housing experts say.

The idea behind the bills package is to stem unnecessary foreclosures, which have hit certain parts of California especially hard. San Diego County has not been able to avert distress. Since 2007, more than 63,000 trustee deeds, which signal a foreclosure, have been filed in the county.

The two most-polarizing proposals of the bills package would push banks to assign one point of contact for property owners per troubled-loan case, and end dual tracking, a practice in which lenders start the foreclosure process even though a borrower has applied for a loan modification, among other things.

Homeowner advocates such as Norma Garcia, of the Consumers Union in the Bay Area, said both proposals would protect property owners “from unnecessary foreclosures and make sure the foreclosure process is a fair one and everyone plays by the rules.”

Several real estate groups, including the California Mortgage Association, say the proposed measures could stall the foreclosure process, further damaging an already weak housing market, and make way for frivolous legal claims, said Mike Belote, a spokesman for the statewide mortgage organization.

The dual-track and single-contact bills will head Thursday to a special legislative hearing that will allow lawmakers to more thoroughly vet them. The remaining parts of the bill of rights, supported by the Attorney General’s Office and U.S. housing chief Shaun Donovan, are not expected to be controversial and are moving through the legislative process.

Here’s a breakdown of the bills involved in the bill of rights:

SB 1470: Prevents banks from starting the foreclosure process if homeowners have begun the process for a loan workout, also called dual tracking. It would require servicers to make decisions on loan-modification applications in a more timely manner. The companion bill is AB 1602.

SB 1471: Requires servicers to streamline the foreclosure process by establishing a set of rules, including assigning a single point of contact for each case. It also calls for a $10,000 fine for any robo-signing incidents, in which banks sign off on loan paperwork without proper review. The companion bill is AB 2425.

SB 1472: Fights neighborhood blight, which happens when properties are not properly maintained after a foreclosure. It would allow cities to levy fines against homeowners who do not properly maintain their properties. This was unanimously approved by the Senate on Thursday. The companion bill is AB 2314.

SB 1473: Ensures renters of foreclosed properties are given at least 90 days before the eviction process is started. The companion bill is AB 2610.

AB 1950: Requires servicers to pay a $25 fee for each recorded notice of default, which kicks off the formal foreclosure process. The money collected would pay for state-run fraud probes.

SB 1464: Allows the state attorney general to create a special grand jury to look into special financial crimes that involve several victims. The companion bill is AB 1763.

lily.leung@utsandiego.com (619) 293-1719 Twitter: lilyshumleung

Article source: http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2012/may/05/tp-homeowner-bill-of-rights-moving-along-in/

Read More
TOP

Look Who’s Pushing Homeowners Off the Foreclosure Cliff

One of the more confounding aspects of
the U.S. housing crisis has been the reluctance of lenders to do
more to assist troubled borrowers. After all, when homes go into
foreclosure, banks lose money.

Now it turns out some lenders haven’t merely been
unhelpful; their actions have pushed some borrowers over the
foreclosure cliff. Lenders have been imposing exorbitant
insurance policies on homeowners whose regular coverage lapses
or is deemed insufficient. The policies, standard homeowner’s
insurance or extra coverage for wind damage, say, for Florida
residents, typically cost five to 10 times what owners were
previously paying, tipping many into foreclosure.

The situation has caught the attention of state regulators
and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which is
considering rules to help homeowners avoid unwarranted “force-
placed insurance.” The U.S. ought to go further and limit
commissions, fine any company that knowingly overcharges a
homeowner and require banks to seek competitive bids for force-
placed insurance policies. Because insurance is not regulated at
the federal level, states also need to play a stronger role in
bringing down rates.

All mortgages require homeowners to maintain insurance on
their property. Most mortgages also allow the lender to purchase
insurance for the home and “force-place” it if a policy lapses
or is deemed insufficient. These standard provisions are meant
to protect the lender’s collateral — the property — if a
calamity occurs.

High-Priced Policies

Here’s how it generally works: Banks and their mortgage
servicers strike arrangements — often exclusive — with
insurance companies in which the banks agree to buy high-priced
policies on behalf of homeowners whose coverage has lapsed. The
bank advances the premium to the insurer, and the insurer pays
the bank a commission, which is priced into the premium.
(Insurers say the commissions compensate banks for expenses like
“advancing premiums, billing and collections.”) The homeowner
is then billed for the premium, commissions and all.

It’s a lucrative business. Premiums on force-placed
insurance exceeded $5.5 billion in 2010, according to the Center
for Economic Justice
, a group that advocates on behalf of low-
income consumers. An investigation by Benjamin Lawsky, who heads
New York State’s Department of Financial Services, has found
nearly 15 percent of the premiums flow back to the banks.

It doesn’t end there. Lenders often get an additional cut
of the profits by reinsuring the force-placed policy through the
bank’s insurance subsidiary. That puts the lender in the
conflicted position of requiring insurance to protect its
collateral but with a financial incentive to never pay out a
claim.

Both New York and California regulators have found the loss
ratio on these policies — the percentage of premiums paid on
claims — to be significantly lower than what insurers told the
state they expected to pay out, suggesting that premiums are too
high. For instance, most insurers estimate a loss ratio of 55
percent, meaning they’ll have to pay out about 55 cents on the
dollar. But actual loss ratios have averaged about 20 percent
over the last six years.

It’s worth noting that force-placed policies often provide
less protection than cheaper policies available on the open
market, a fact often not clearly disclosed. The policies
generally protect the lender’s financial interest, not the
homeowner’s. If a fire wipes out a house, most force-placed
policies would pay only to repair the structure and nothing
else.

Lack of Clarity

Homeowners can obviously avoid force-placed insurance by
keeping their coverage current. Banks are required to remove the
insurance as soon as a homeowner offers proof of other coverage.
But the system, as the New York state investigation and
countless lawsuits have demonstrated, is defined by a woeful
lack of clarity, so much so that Fannie Mae has issued a
directive to loan servicers to lower insurance costs and speed
up removal times. And it said it would no longer reimburse
commissions. The recent settlement with five financial firms
over foreclosure abuses also requires banks to limit excessive
coverage and ensure policies are purchased “for a commercially
reasonable price.”

That’s not enough. Tougher standards should be applied
uniformly, regardless of the loan source. Freddie Mac should
follow Fannie Mae’s lead and require competitive pricing on the
loans it backs. The consumer bureau should require mortgage
servicers to reinstate a homeowner’s previous policy whenever
possible, or to obtain competitive bids when not.

The bureau should also prevent loan servicers from
accepting commissions or, at the very least, prohibit
commissions from inflating the premium. It should require
servicers to better communicate to borrowers that their policy
has lapsed, explain clearly what force-placed insurance will
cost and extend a grace period to secure new coverage. Finally,
states should follow the example of California, which recently
told force-placed insurers to submit lower rates that reflect
actual loss ratios.

Many homeowners who experience coverage gaps have severe
financial problems that lead them to stop paying their insurance
bills. They are already at great risk of foreclosure. Banks and
insurers shouldn’t be allowed to add to the likelihood of
default by artificially inflating the cost of insurance.

Read more opinion online from Bloomberg View.

Today’s highlights: the View editors on bank-capital rules;
William D. Cohan on e-mails from the fall of Lehman; Pankaj
Mishra
on accusations against the Indian military; Albert R.
Hunt
on congressional elections; Michael Ross on Vladimir
Putin’s oil-money machinations
.

To contact the Bloomberg View editorial board:
view@bloomberg.net.

Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.

Article source: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-06/look-who-s-pushing-homeowners-off-the-foreclosure-cliff.html

Read More
TOP

CREC exec integrates wellness, sustainable living with real estate

For Carol Greenberg Brooks, the ideas of sustainable living and wellness are more than just corporate buzzwords. She has found a way to combine her values and her real estate business.

It started with offering yoga classes and smoothie breaks to her employees at Coral Gables-based Continental Real Estate Companies. Now, Brooks, co-founder and president of CREC, is thinking bigger: working with her property owners to establish wellness programs in vacant office space. In today’s competitive real estate market, it has become another marketing tool landlords can use to lure tenants.

But for Brooks, it’s about much more.

“In today’s always-connected, always ‘on’ world, it’s easy to lose track of what’s important,” Brooks said. “I believe taking care of yourself and living sustainably can enrich your personal life and make your business life more fulfilling.

“Wellness is good for business, in terms of creating a more productive, creative workplace, and establishing long-term relationships with clients and employees,” she said. “Real estate is a relationship-first business, and our wellness programs provide added value for clients.”

Brooks has lead CREC along with co-founder Warren Weiser for more than two decades. Today, the firm oversees a leasing and management portfolio composed of 11.4 million square feet of retail, office and multifamily buildings around the state.

We asked Brooks for her thoughts on sustainable living, the real estate market and more. Here is an edited version of her comments:Q: How have you found ways to merge your beliefs in sustainable living and wellness into your real estate business?

I believe in the adage “practice what you preach.” In 2010, we launched a CREC-sponsored program called ABC Grow with the United Way of Miami-Dade County. By exposing children to organic gardening at school from a young age, we can hopefully illustrate how healthy, fun, and educational it can be to plant a garden, watch it grow, and eat what they’ve grown!

I also began an initiative we named A Deeper Breath, which encourages offices to establish wellness programs in vacant office space. Working with landlords, we facilitate weekly nutrition courses, yoga classes and meditation sessions for the building tenants — at no cost. We provide the tools for a healthy work environment within our own firm as well, offering firm-wide yoga classes, smoothie breaks and on-site massages.Q: How are these programs like A Deeper Breath helping your property owners compete?

Property owners are always seeking new ways to gain a competitive advantage. A Deeper Breath enables them to provide added value to their tenants at relatively little or no cost, while their employees benefit from a healthy, more enjoyable workplace. This creates more productive businesses. It’s a perfect example of how real estate isn’t just about transaction value or square footage — it’s about people and service-driven relationships.Q: Where do you think we are in the cycle of distressed commercial assets and workouts?

We are at a point where commercial lenders are working their way through the lengthy foreclosure process, taking control of assets and adding whatever value they can with the goal of attracting buyers. In the fourth quarter of 2011 alone, CREC completed 15 lender-owned sales valued at $100 million across Florida. I believe we have another two to three years of distress in the market where underwater or broken deals will continue to emerge from default and into the hands of opportunistic investors.Q: How does the situation in Miami-Dade compare to Broward? And South Florida compared to the rest of the state?

Article source: http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/04/22/2786911/crec-exec-integrates-wellness.html

Read More
TOP

Bills adding protections for gays divide Assembly

Last week, lawmakers approved three bills that apply existing state programs to gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender business owners, government workers and foster children. This week, they will weigh in on what may be the year’s signature piece of gay rights legislation, a bill that would prohibit “gay-to-straight” therapy for minors.

Republican lawmakers in the 80-member Assembly are not letting the reforms through quietly, prompting harsh reactions from some of their Democratic counterparts. Assemblyman Tom Ammiano, D-San Francisco, called the Republicans’ objections “idiotic drivel.”

“It’s just infuriating to see, particularly for young people, these very harmful attitudes,” he said in a telephone interview. “I’m sick of it.”

Tensions were on display Monday when Assemblyman Roger Dickinson, D-Sacramento, introduced a bill that would require the state to track the number of gay and lesbian business owners with which it contracts. California currently collects data on contractors’ race, ethnicity and gender.

Assemblyman Chris Norby, R-Fullerton, immediately raised his microphone to object to the collection of personal information, “whether it’s immutable characteristics, or those that may be mutable.”

Such a bill would “inevitably lead to quotas,” he said.

Assemblywoman Linda Halderman, R-Fresno, took up the thread, saying some people would “cheat the system” by lying about their sexual orientation, while others would feel exposed.

“There are people who choose to keep their sexuality private, and this looks like it would disadvantage them,” she said.

Dickinson responded that the bill would not allow the state to favor gay-owned businesses. He said the check-off box is necessary to show the importance to the state’s economy of businesses owned by gays and lesbians.

After Halderman reaffirmed her concerns, Dickinson appeared to grow annoyed, shaking his head and gesturing with his hands.

“There’s no quotas, no path to quotas, no hint or suggestion or scintilla of anything to do with quotas in this legislation,” he said.

Ammiano also was visibly upset, arching his eyebrows and speaking quickly.

“This is a group that has been invisible for a long time and contributes to the economy of California, and it’s time they took their rightful place. Stop this silly parsing,” he said.

The bill passed on a party line vote, with Assemblyman Nathan Fletcher, who recently left the Republican party and became independent as he runs for mayor of San Diego, joining the Democrats.

A few days later, a bill to mandate sexual orientation sensitivity training for foster care parents also passed on party lines.

Norby criticized the legislation as a piece of social engineering that would encourage foster parents to impose a sexual orientation on small children.

“If you’ve got a 10-year-old foster kid at home, are you really supposed to get the training?” he said in a telephone interview. “I think what this is leading down to is the foster kids themselves are going to be identified as gay or straight.”

The tone is noticeably different in the 40-member Senate, where on the same day, lawmakers passed a bill with no opposition clarifying that domestic partners are entitled to the same rights in the public pension system as married spouses.

The lack of debate on the matter prompted Sen. Sam Blakeslee, R-San Luis Obispo, to rise later in the session and note what he called an “uplifting” development regarding domestic partnerships. He called it potentially an “historic” day that should not go unrecognized.

Another historic day may be approaching in the Senate.

A bill by Sen. Ted Lieu, D-Torrance, that would make California the first state in the nation to outlaw gay-to-straight counseling for minors is scheduled for its final committee hearing on Tuesday. It will go to the full Senate if approved.

The practice of “reparative therapy” received national attention when former Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann was questioned over whether the Christian counseling business of her husband provided therapies that attempted to change gays and lesbians.

The three bills approved last week and the therapy bill have some conservative groups raising alarms.

“It’s the LGBT agenda tramping the rights of everybody else,” said Randy Thomasson, president of SaveCalifornia.com, a Sacramento-based nonprofit that advocates for conservative moral values.

The four gay rights bills:

— AB1960 by Dickinson, would allow the owners of businesses contracting with the state to identify themselves as gay, lesbian, transgender or bisexual. The Department of General Services already collects data on contractors by race, ethnicity and gender. The bill would not require business owners to identify their sexual orientation. Passed 46-23 and moves to the Senate.

— AB1856 by Ammiano, would require the state Department of Social Services to expand its foster parent education program to include sensitivity training on the topic of sexual orientation. Passed 49-21 and moves to the Senate.

— SB987 by Sen. Gloria Negrete McLeod, D-Chino, would make several technical changes to the codes governing the public retirement system. Among other things, the bill requires the state to give domestic partners the same benefits as married spouses. Passed 31-0 and moves to the Assembly.

— SB1172 by Lieu, would prohibit therapists from practicing gay-to-straight counseling on patients younger than 18. Adult patients would have to give written consent. The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to take up the bill Tuesday.

___

Associated Press writer Don Thompson contributed to this report.

Article source: http://www.necn.com/05/06/12/Bills-adding-protections-for-gays-divide/landing_politics.html?&apID=e3d297c545ab406880ff37d58db4dddd

Read More